Bet Jamaica Preview — Southern Illinois Salukis vs. Duke Blue Devils
November 20, 2008
The Southern Illinois Salukis and the Duke Blue Devils will both be trying to pick up a win on Thursday when they battle at Madison Square Garden.
Oddsmakers currently have the Blue Devils listed as 12½-point favorites versus the Salukis, while the game’s total has not yet been posted.
Southern Illinois picked up a win with an 80-73 victory over Massachusetts in the Coaches vs. Cancer tournament on Wednesday. Southern Illinois covered the 5-point spread, while the 153 points sailed OVER the posted total of 134.
Bryan Mullins had 16 points and 13 assists, and Carlton Fay added 17 in that win.
The Blue Devils defeated Rhode Island 82-79 as a 25.5-point favorite on Sunday. The combined score fell UNDER the posted over/under total (162).
Jon Scheyer scored a game-high 25 points for Duke, while Kyle Singler added 19 points in the win.
Current streak:
Southern Illinois has won 2 straight games.
Duke has won 3 straight games.
Team records:
Southern Illinois: 2-0 SU, 1-0 ATS
Duke: 3-0 SU, 1-2 ATS
Southern Illinois most recently:
When playing on Thursday are 6-4
Before playing Western Kentucky are 2-1
After playing Massachusetts are 0-1
After a win are 6-4
Duke most recently:
When playing on Thursday are 8-2
After a win are 6-4
A few trends to consider:
Southern Illinois is 8-3 SU in its last 11 games
The total has gone UNDER in 4 of Duke’s last 5 games
Duke is 4-1 SU in its last 5 games
Duke is 1-5 ATS in its last 6 games
Next up:
Southern Illinois at Western Kentucky, Wednesday, November 26
Duke home to Montana, Sunday, November 23
Bet Jamaica Preview — Wofford Terriers vs. Clemson Tigers
November 19, 2008
The Wofford Terriers and the Clemson Tigers will both be gunning for a victory on Wednesday when they meet at Littlejohn Coliseum.
Odds aren’t yet posted for this game, so check back later for the opening line and total.
The Tigers defeated Temple 76-72 as a 7.5-point favorite in the Charleston Classic on Sunday. The combined score went OVER the posted over/under total (143).
Terrence Oglesby scored 16 points for the Tigers and Trevor Booker added 15 points in the win.
Current streak:
Clemson has won 3 straight games.
Team records:
Wofford: 0-1 SU, 1-0 ATS
Clemson: 3-0 SU, 1-2 ATS
Wofford most recently:
When playing on Wednesday are 5-5
After playing Dayton are 0-1
After a loss are 3-7
Clemson most recently:
When playing on Wednesday are 6-4
Before playing Charlotte are 0-1
After a win are 6-4
A few trends to consider:
Wofford is 5-0 ATS in its last 5 games when playing Clemson
Wofford is 5-0 ATS in its last 5 games when playing on the road against Clemson
The total has gone UNDER in 4 of Wofford’s last 5 games
The total has gone UNDER in 5 of Wofford’s last 7 games on the road
Clemson is 5-0 SU in its last 5 games when playing Wofford
Clemson is 5-0 SU in its last 5 games when playing at home against Wofford
Clemson is 11-1 SU in its last 12 games at home
Clemson is 6-2 SU in its last 8 games
Next up:
Wofford home to Texas-Pan American, Saturday, November 22
Clemson at Charlotte, Saturday, November 22
Bet Jamaica Preview — North Texas Mean Green vs. Oklahoma State Cowboys
November 17, 2008
The North Texas Mean Green and the Oklahoma State Cowboys will both be gunning for a victory on Monday when they meet at Gallagher-Iba Arena.
Oddsmakers currently have the Cowboys listed as 11-point favorites versus the Mean Green, while the game’s total has not yet been posted.
Team records:
North Texas: 1-0 SU, 0-0 ATS
Oklahoma State: 1-0 SU, 0-0 ATS
North Texas most recently:
When playing on Monday are 7-3
Before playing Sam Houston State are 1-1
After playing Cameron are 2-0
After a win are 6-4
Oklahoma State most recently:
When playing on Monday are 7-3
Before playing Tulsa are 2-0
After playing Texas-San Antonio are 3-2
After a win are 6-4
A few trends to consider:
North Texas is 7-2 SU in its last 9 games
North Texas is 2-4 ATS in its last 6 games when playing Oklahoma State
North Texas is 2-4-1 ATS in its last 7 games on the road
North Texas is 3-8 SU in its last 11 games on the road
Oklahoma State is 5-1 SU in its last 6 games at home
Oklahoma State is 5-1 SU in its last 6 games when playing North Texas
Oklahoma State is 4-2 ATS in its last 6 games when playing North Texas
Oklahoma State is 2-4 SU in its last 6 games
Next up:
North Texas at Sam Houston State, Thursday, November 20
Oklahoma State home to Tulsa, Thursday, November 20
NCAA Hoops Betting - NCAA Basketball betting opens up
November 15, 2008
By: BetOnline.com
NCAA basketball betting sharps, sportsbook customers and offshore sports betting enthusiasts have their eyes on the NCAA basketball odds, NCAA basketball lines and NCAA basketball spreads for the first time in a long while, as the college hoops season has finally opened up.
As usual, the season begins with the 2K Sports Coaches Fighting Cancer tournament. UCLA opened the tournament, failing to cover NCAA basketball spreads against Prairie View A&M, but still beating them handily. Similarly, Duke didn’t cover the NCAA basketball lines against their first round opponent, but still won by a wide magain. It looks as though UCLA and Duke may meet up in the finals, which could be a very early preview of a NCAA Final Four Betting matchup for later this year.
Other powerhouses such as North Carolina and Memphis open their seasons this weekend, and should have no trouble handling Division II opening week opponents! This is by far the most profitable week for bettors in terms of NCAA basketball betting, as they can take advantage of lopsided games and heavy favorites. One strategy is to parlay many of these games together, for added value—something that is offered at BetOnline.com!
So head over to BetOnline.com, check out the NCAA basketball odds, NCAA basketball lines and NCAA basketball spreads and lay down your opening week picks and cash in! Shoot to score, sports bettors!
For more insight on NCAA football lines, NCAA football odds, NCAA football spreads, NFL football lines, NFL football spreads, NFL football picks, NFL football odds UFC odds, UFC lines, UFC spreads, UFC picks, NBA odds, NBA lines, NBA spreads and NBA picks, visit BetOnline.com. BetOnline’s “Betting Edge” also offers insight into UFC betting odds, NHL futures, NASCAR betting and the upcoming World Baseball Classic odds.
Bet Jamaica Preview — Eastern Washington Eagles vs. Illinois Fighting Illini
November 14, 2008
The Eastern Washington Eagles and the Illinois Fighting Illini will both be gunning for a victory on Friday when they meet at University of Illinois Assembly Hall.
Oddsmakers currently have the Fighting Illini listed as 19½-point favorites versus the Eagles, while the game’s total has not yet been posted.
Team records:
Eastern Washington: 0-0 SU, 0-0 ATS
Illinois: 0-0 SU, 0-0 ATS
Eastern Washington most recently:
When playing on Friday are 6-4
Before playing UC Irvine are 0-2
After playing Portland State are 5-5
After a loss are 4-6
Illinois most recently:
When playing on Friday are 5-5
Before playing Texas A&M C.C. are 0-1
After playing Wisconsin are 6-4
After a loss are 5-5
A few trends to consider:
Eastern Washington is 6-1 ATS in its last 7 games
Eastern Washington is 4-1 ATS in its last 5 games on the road
The total has gone OVER in 5 of Eastern Washington’s last 7 games on the road
Eastern Washington is 3-7 SU in its last 10 games
Illinois is 4-1 SU in its last 5 games
The total has gone UNDER in 6 of Illinois’s last 8 games
The total has gone OVER in 6 of Illinois’s last 9 games at home
Illinois is 8-15 SU in its last 23 games
Next up:
Eastern Washington at UC Irvine, Wednesday, November 19
Illinois home to Texas A&M C.C., Sunday, November 16
Bet Jamaica Preview — Georgia Southern Eagles vs. Duke Blue Devils
November 11, 2008
The fans at Cameron Indoor Stadium will be treated to a game between the Georgia Southern Eagles and the Duke Blue Devils when they take their seats on Tuesday.
Odds aren’t yet posted for this game, so check back later for the opening line and total.
Trumaine Pearson led the way with 19 points on Monday as Georgia Southern got past Houston 65-63 in the opening game of the Coaches vs. Cancer tournament.
The Cougars had been favored by 7.5 points in that contest, while the combined score fell UNDER the day’s posted total (157).
Kyle Singler went for 19 points and 10 rebounds, as Duke ripped Presbyterian 80-49 in the Coaches vs. Cancer Classic on Monday night.
Duke failed to cover as 33-point home favorites as the teams played under the 138-point total set by oddsmakers.
Team records:
Georgia Southern: 1-0 SU, 1-0 ATS
Duke: 1-0 SU, 0-1 ATS
Georgia Southern most recently:
When playing on Tuesday are 5-3
Before playing Reinhardt are 0-1
After a win are 7-3
Duke most recently:
When playing on Tuesday are 9-1
After a win are 6-4
A few trends to consider:
The total has gone OVER in 5 of Georgia Southern’s last 6 games
The total has gone OVER in 4 of Georgia Southern’s last 5 games on the road
Georgia Southern is 1-4 SU in its last 5 games
Georgia Southern is 1-4 ATS in its last 5 games
The total has gone UNDER in 6 of Duke’s last 7 games
The total has gone UNDER in 6 of Duke’s last 7 games at home
Duke is 21-4 SU in its last 25 games at home
Duke is 19-5 SU in its last 24 games
Next up:
Georgia Southern home to Reinhardt, Friday, November 14
Duke home to Rhode Island, Sunday, November 16
Sports Betting: Did You Have Two Left Feet With The Big Dance?
June 18, 2008
Like most gamblers, college basketball fans, particularly those who enjoy sports betting on the NCAA Men’s Tournament (who doesn’t?) would, understandably, much rather look ahead to the next bet than back at the last one. But savvy sports betting aficionados also understand that a review of previous actions, no matter how tedious and time-consuming, sometimes can yield substantial clues for the next time the bettor is presented with a similar situation.
A case in point is the much ballyhooed analysis comparing opening round seedings against the pointspread. Technical handicappers, those earnest folks who diligently study reams of data and results, crunching numbers in hope of uncovering a wagering pattern, probably are scratching their heads after this year’s games.
No. 16 seeds, which enjoyed a 14-10 pointspread edge over No. 1 seeds since 2002, only covered one of four matchups this season, and that, just barely, when Texas-Arlington, +25, lost by 24 points to Memphis, 87-63. The other three No. 16 seeds, Mount St. Mary’s (+31), Portland State (+23), and Mississippi Valley State (+29), all failed to cover against, respectively, North Carolina, Kansas and UCLA.
No. 15 seeds, which had notched a 15-9 against the pointspread (STS) edge versus No. 2 seeds since 2002, split four opening round contests as Belmont (+21) succeeded against Duke and American University (+20) beat the pointspread versus Tennessee but Maryland Baltimore County (+17) and Austin Peay (+18) came up short against Georgetown and Texas, respectively.
Alas, for technical bettors who respected history and went with the eight lowest seeded teams, the opening week of the Big Dance produced a 3-5 losing record against the pointspread.
But it wasn’t all bad news for the data devotees.
The strongest play historically, No. 7 seeds over No. 10 seeds, again held up well in 2008. The matchup, which had yielded a 17-7 pointspread advantage since 2002, went 3-1 this year as No. 7 seeds Miami (-1 1/2), Butler (-3 1/2), and West Virginia (-2) covered their numbers against St. Mary’s, South Alabama and Arizona, respectively. The other No. 7 seed, Gonzaga (pick �em) lost to Davidson.
Another historically strong play, No. 6 seeds over No. 11 seeds, also performed well in this year’s NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament opening round. The matchup, which had produced a 14-10 pointspread edge for No. 6 seeds since 2002, went 3-1 this year as Oklahoma (-2), Purdue (-2 1/2), and Marquette (-5) beat the pointspread against respective victims St. Joseph’s, Baylor and Kentucky. Only Southern Cal (-3), failed to live up to betting expectations, losing outright to Kansas State.
Since 2002, the 3-14, 4-13 and 5-12 opening round matchups have failed to yield significant pointspread differences, a betting trend which was repeated in two of the three pairings this year. No. 4 seeds, which were a combined 13-11 ATS coming into this year’s action, were 2-2 ATS. No. 5 seeds, which entered March Madness dead-even with No. 12 seeds at 11-11-2 ATS, left the opening round the same way was after a 2-2 ATS split.
Only No. 3 seeds broke the pattern. Third-seeded teams, which were a tepid 12-11-1 ATS versus No. 14 teams since 2002, surprised technical handicappers with a 4-0 pointspread season. Louisville (-13) beat the spread against Boise State, Xavier (-6) covered versus Georgia, Wisconsin (-11) rewarded favorite players against Cal State-Fullerton, and Stanford (-16 1/2) aced its pointspread test against Cornell.
So what have we learned? For starters in sports betting, college basketball betting in general, and NCAA Tournament Basketball betting in particular, like so many other sports, don’t always live up to past trends.
So, while technical handicapping may have its merits, its clearly no slam-dunk shortcut to riches and certainly no substitute for individual game analysis and handicapping that can lead to basketball betting success.
This article was written by Luken Karel for http://www.thegreek.com. The Greek Sportsbook & Casino is host to one of the top online sportsbooks offering sports betting on NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL and all other major sports. The Greek is a must have sports betting and entertainment portal with one of the largest wagering menus available online.
Ncaa Bracket Betting
June 18, 2008
NCAA basketball is in full swing but, arguably, the two best wagering days of the year, the NCAA bracket opening rounds of the Men’s Basketball Championship, March 20 ands 21, are in the sights of every March Madness betting fan.
While those 32 NCAA bracket opening round match-ups won’t be revealed to college basketball betting devotees until the Selection Committee unveils the 65-team field (there’s a play-in game in Dayton, Mar. 18) on Mar. 16, gamblers can get an early rush for their money by investing in March Madness futures.
Many sportsbooks have lists that include far more than the 65 teams that eventually will have an opportunity to snip down the nets in the Alamodome, in San Antonio, April 7 but while there’s a moderate risk that your NCAA bracket selection won’t make the final cut, there’s also the chance to secure a team at a much better price than you’ll get when the tournament starts.
A March Madness future book exists on its own as a valid sports betting tool but savvy gamblers also understand that having a handful of teams to win it all also allows them the option of making a money line bet on the other team if one of their future book selections makes it all the way to the championship game. What’s more, holding a few future book ducats can provide flexibility for the bettor who wants to broaden his wagering net to include propositions such as betting on a regional winner.
Prices on highly regarded teams such as North Carolina, Memphis, UCLA, Michigan State, Tennessee, Kansas, Duke, Georgetown and Louisville aren’t likely to change much since these teams already have assured themselves a spot in the Big Dance.
The value will be in trying to find so-called “bubble teams,” those outfits that have yet to play themselves into the tournament but, if they do, will be a much shorter price than they are now.
History tells us that outside seeds haven’t much of a chance to win it all but teams in the middle of the pack cannot be discounted.
Teams such as BYU, Connecticut, Maryland, Clemson, Marquette, Kent State, Oklahoma, Mississippi State and Arkansas could be in that category.
Future book betting odds vary greatly from sportsbook to sportsbook but at least one wagering watering hole listed BYU at 125/1. The Cougars are the best in the Mountain West Conference and boast a victory over Louisville.
UConn has been a pleasant surprise in the ultra-competitive Big East and 35/1 looks attractive.
Maryland and Clemson don’t get the ink that ACC stalwarts Duke and North Carolina do but both the Terrapins and the Tigers, each at 60/1, are inviting longshots. Maryland owns a win over North Carolina while Clemson has beaten top 25 teams Mississippi State and Purdue.
Some believe that Marquette is worth a wager at odds of 40/1. The Golden Eagles have taken down Pittsburgh, Notre Dame and Wisconsin and don’t have a “bad loss” on their resume.
Kent State is the class of the Mid-America’s Eastern Division and at 300/1 would be a giant score.
Oklahoma sometimes gets lost in the Big 12 shuffle but wins over Gonzaga, Arkansas, Baylor and West Virginia attest to the Sooners’ ability. A future book price of 60/1 is tempting.
SEC rivals Mississippi State and Arkansas also rate a look. The Bulldogs, 50/1, have split two games with Arkansas and shown that they can win on the road, a factor sure to impress the Selection Committee. The Razorbacks, also 50/1, have defeated four quality teams, Baylor, Mississippi State, Oral Roberts and Mississippi.
Other intriguing longshots include Rhode Island, 250/1; West Virginia, 50/1; Baylor, 200/1; Ohio State, 60/1; and Arizona State, 150/1.
We’ll get to the NCAA bracket soon enough. Until we do, a March Madness future book wager or two should scratch your college basketball betting itch.
This article was written by Luken Karel for http://www.thegreek.com. The Greek Sportsbook & Casino is host to one of the top online sportsbooks offering sports betting on NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL and all other major sports. The Greek is a must have sports betting and entertainment portal with one of the largest wagering menus available online.
SEVEN HANDICAPPING FACTORS TO CONSIDER DURING MARCH MADNESS
June 17, 2008
Second only to the Super Bowl in wagering popularity, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, which is set to tip-off March 15, offers a unique set of challenges for bettors who get involved in “March Madness.”
In fact, there are seven key handicapping and betting factors that distinguish the “Big Dance” from the collegiate hardwood regular season:
The Odd Couples: Oddsmakers usually employ Power Ratings, a numerical assessment that helps them establish a working pointspread. But what happens when a team, because it never or rarely is on the board during the regular season, doesn’t have a Power Rating? In those cases, price makers often are flying in the dark.
That could explain how Montana, Northwestern State, Bucknell, Southern University, Winthrop, George Mason, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Murray State, Monmouth, Albany and Pennsylvania all beat the spread in last year’s opening round.
The point is, when it comes to a matchup of a traditional power against a second or third tier team that probably hasn’t been on the board all year, there’s margin for a price making error. Players who recognize those mistakes can place a wager with a high likelihood of success.
Out of Site: Theoretically, all March Madness Tournament games are played at neutral sites. But would Illinois have beaten Arizona and made it to the title game in 2005 if the Illini were not so fortunate as to get to play their regional final game in the Allstate Arena in Chicago? Illinois prevailed 90-89 in overtime, a result that easily could have gone the other way had the game been contested on a more neutral court. Check those brackets! While not technically playing at home, some teams will enjoy regional advantages that could spell the difference in a tight game.
In Guard We Trust: Because elimination hovers above the necks of players like a guillotine, pressure - both physical and psychological - plays an enormous role in the Tournament, making it almost impossible to succeed without a composed and experienced player at pointguard.
Three-mendous: It’s often an all-or-nothing strategy but teams that live by the three-point shot not only sometimes die by it but sometimes wipe out huge deficits (or build big leads) and score the upset. A team that can shoot the trey always is dangerous, especially against a weak foul-shooting team that is trying to manage a lead.
Whistle blowers: You’re not only going to have the best teams in the NCAA March Madness Tournament but the best referees, as well. So don’t expect these officials to swallow their whistles in the waning minutes of the game. If a foul occurs, expect it to be called. Given that, if you wager on a team that shoots less than 75 percent from the free throw line, you do so at your own peril.
Tempo: “Pace makes race,” goes the saying on the racetrack but it’s even truer during March Madness, where a gap in talent makes those style differences more important. Some teams like to run; others prefer a deliberate style of play. Some teams shoot a lot of treys while others feed the post, attack the rim and pick up points on the foul line. The team that wins the battle of tempo often is likely to also win the game. Determining which team will dictate the pace can help a bettor decide which team to bet.
Time: The old adage that sportsbooks only have to be wrong once for bettors to take advantage of them was never truer than during the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. Once the Selection Committee announces the March Madness Tournament’s pairings and brackets, oddsmakers and sportsbooks only have about three hours to dispense 32 pointspreads and an equal number of totals to a sports betting public that is eager to attack those numbers.
Given the time pressure and the inherent complexity involved in setting spreads for a number of obscure teams, sometimes errors can occur. The advantage for the player is that while sportsbooks must post prices on every game, the gambler gets to pick his spots, choosing only the most advantageous matchups.
Pay attention to these seven factors and you should be more successful betting the NCAA Basketball March Madness Tournament.
This article was written by Luken Karel for http://www.thegreek.com. The Greek Sportsbook & Casino is host to one of the top online sportsbooks offering March Madness wagering and sports betting on NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL and all other major sports. The Greek is a must have sports betting and entertainment portal with one of the largest wagering menus available online. Article reproductions must include a link pointing to http://www.thegreek.com.
Visit The Greek Sports Book for more Sportsbook Articles and Sports Betting information.
SIX TIPS FOR COLLEGE BASKETBALL BETTING
June 17, 2008
In terms of sheer numbers, no sport matches the opportunity, intrigue, depth of quality, or endless variety involved with college basketball betting. Nearly every day of the week, from mid-November through March, bettors and sportsbooks match bankrolls on the hardwood fortunes of 235 teams in more than a dozen conferences.
While number crunching and detailed analysis always are essential tools in college basketball betting, a degree of “art” compliments the “science” and is helpful, too. The successful bettor understands that subjective analysis of a number of other factors also must be considered.
Let’s look at a number of these elements:
Teeming with teams: Competition all but mandates that a sportsbook posts prices on over 200 teams, (as compared to 30 NBA clubs) providing the gambler with many more options. For bettors, it’s a lot easier to find a bad number among 100 games than it is to find one among 13 or 14.
Home, sweet home: Sure, the home court is a factor in NBA play but it’s the tiresome travel associated with getting to a road game that puts the visiting team at a disadvantage in the pro ranks. For that reason, NBA spreads are affected more by schedule than by actual home court.
Since NCAA teams only play about 30 games a year, lengthy road trips aren’t a factor in college play. Nevertheless, with its requisite contingent of chanting, sign-waving students, the home court really does matter in college basketball betting. In fact, the home court can be such an advantage that there may be as much as a 10-point swing in home-and-home series pointspreads.
Morale: A shorter schedule and more heated rivalries, particularly within conferences or states, all but guarantees that emotion, especially when you’re dealing with impressionable teenagers, will play a greater role in college basketball than it does in the NBA. For that reason, assessing a team’s motivation can be a crucial factor in college basketball betting.
Revenge: Another factor unique to college basketball is revenge. A team that lost to an opponent once often is troublesome to tame the second time around. This is a scenario that plays itself out in conference play, where splits are more common than sweeps.
Freshmen: Time was that first year recruits sat on the pine and waited their turn. Nowadays, if you’re good enough to play, coaches put you in the game.
Interestingly, the emergence of freshmen as major contributors has required sportsbooks and bettors to track the careers of high school seniors, monitoring their college choices and assessing the impact they may have on those programs. Ohio State, which landed prized center Greg Oden, North Carolina, Texas, Connecticut, Duke, Tennessee, Washington, Georgia Tech, Louisville, Wake Forest, Stanford and Kansas are among the schools whose recruiting hauls could have a sizable impact on their fortunes this season.
Since no sport is more affected by a single player than basketball, every new addition–freshman, junior college or transfer–has the opportunity to alter the dynamic of the team.
Three-for-all: Further complicating the oddsmaking and betting equation is that college basketball is much more like a three-act play than a seamless season.
Act I begins in mid-November and extends through the end of the year when teams play most of their non-conference games. For teams still seeking an identity, this is a chance for experimentation with different lineups and strategies, a time of growing pains that often are reflected by the pointspread. Other teams, ones with experienced players, have an obvious advantage in cohesiveness. After all, basketball is a team sport.
Act II begins with the tip-off of the conference schedule, which starts in January. Teams have worked out the kinks by now and, for the most part, are ready to face a series of opponents with whom they have some familiarity. The teams may play each other as many as two or three times each season–twice in conference play and perhaps again in the league’s tournament–and coaches know each other and their preferred style of play. There are few surprises and, except for those occasions when the very best teams are playing the very worst teams, close games are common.
For the fortunate, the curtain will rise for Act III, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, in March. It is the unpredictable nature of the “Big Dance,” the convergence of teams that have as much in common as Rick Majerus and hair spray, which makes “March Madness” the oddsmaking and sports betting challenge that it is.
Because of its uniqueness, bet makers and bet takers approach the tournament both respectful and wary of an entirely different set of factors that rarely come into play during college basketball’s regular season. We’ll examine that aspect of college basketball betting next spring.
This article was written by Luken Karel for http://www.thegreek.com. The Greek Sportsbook & Casino is host to one of the top online sportsbooks offering betting lines on NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL and all other major sports. The Greek is a must have sports betting and entertainment portal with one of the largest wagering menus available online. Article reproductions must include a link pointing to http://www.thegreek.com.
Visit The Greek Sports Book for more Sportsbook Articles and Sports Betting information.
Featured Gambling Articles
- Bet Jamaica Preview — Miami Hurricanes vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
- Bet Jamaica Preview — Southern Illinois Salukis vs. Duke Blue Devils
- Bet Jamaica Preview — Vancouver Canucks vs. Minnesota Wild
- Bet Jamaica Daily Sports Roundup: November 20
- NBA Betting - Lakers and Suns primed to put up the points